Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - Printable Version +- NightOwl Forums (https://forums.nightowlpro.com) +-- Forum: The Crypt (https://forums.nightowlpro.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Off Topic (https://forums.nightowlpro.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask (/showthread.php?tid=3926) |
Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - WarLocK - 12-23-2004 This is for many of the loopholes and questions that you may have regarding the H1 mask and replicas... Thought that some of you out there may find this very informative. It\'s a lot to read... but damn worth it. [url=\"http://www.stormpages.com/75kirk/MyersCourt.txt\"]http://www.stormpages.com/75kirk/MyersCourt.txt[/url] Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - Eddie - 12-23-2004 Potentially stupid question: Did this trial actually take place? Eddie Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - WarLocK - 12-23-2004 Yes my friend. I believe it did... However I am not completely sure of the outcome. Any info out there would be appreciated. Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - GBeninati - 12-23-2004 that\'s interesting Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - WarLocK - 12-23-2004 Nevermind... it says under conclusion "Plaintiffs do point to testimony that people within the mask industry, including defendant, were aware that Don Post Studios made DPTM. This evidence says nothing, however, about why consumers buy DPTM to wear on Halloween night. Lacking any evidence demonstrating that DPTM’s features are source-indicative rather than aesthetic, see id., the court finds that DPTM has not acquired secondary meaning within § 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ trade dress claim fails because plaintiffs have not shown that DPTM has acquired secondary meaning. For the reasons stated above, the court finds that plaintiff’s copyright in DPTM is invalid because DPTM lacks the requisite originality. The court also finds that defendant created its mask independent of plaintiffs’ DPTM. Finally, plaintiffs’ trade dress infringement claim fails because DPTM has not acquired secondary meaning" Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - Tom - 12-23-2004 thanks for the link man,good readin\' Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - englundisgod - 12-23-2004 can someone just sum it up for me in like point form or something Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - VF31 - 12-23-2004 damn, great read! thank man Factual Information Regarding The H1 Mask - H8shape - 12-24-2004 Hey Warlock- Call me this weekend bud & I can tell you all about it! Trust me, I know the WHOLE truth about it. -David |