A New Friday The 13th Film?

[🪦 adam ●]

I don\'t mean to argue but the part where he takes the machete out is basically part of the part 2 flashback, not the part 3 movie. He is in the overalls in his perv-shack/altar still from part 2. I wouldn\'t doubt if this footage was from the part shoot since they pretty much new they would make sequels indefinately.

Well, the only problem with that theory is, you can clearly tell its Richard Brooker in the overalls and flannel. The purpose of that scene was to show him getting away and not have to show the scene at the end of part 2 in the recap, since Jason\'s look was radically different in 3. So, this would make what happened to Ginny at the end of 2 a nightmare at the end, like with Jason at the end of part 1.

The radio "events" would be the events of the proposed prequel. There had to be something inbetween. Otherwise what the hell was Chris talking about? The other possibility is something before part 2. It obviously didn\'t happen during the events of part 2. Especially if you notice he isn\'t wearing the overalls or the plaid shirt from part 2 in the Chris flashback. And whatever clothes he is wearing he decided to change them at the start of part 3. Maybe because they were also now "dirtied". The kink in this is they actually show footage of Ginny getting loaded in the ambulance and mention she is the only survivor. If it was only talking about anonymous victims then it wouldn\'t have to be the part 2 victims. It lists the number of victims at 8 (The must not be including Alice or the cop), and hints more may be found. They never actually say when the Ginny killings happened, just that the made a gruesome discovery "today", which may not have been the same or even next day neccessarily. That is the "in". There could be a couple days (he usually only needs 1) for some more action. His shoulder wound doesn\'t seem to be weeping through his shirt or hindering him in part 3 at all, maybe it was longer even.

Very true, but remember, these are cheaply made films, and the production for continuity and obvious things is sometimes very lacking and poor. The whole unofficial theory with part 3 is that Jason, after having somewhat of a defeat at the end of part 2 left the scene, shaved his head, and changed clothes to hide his identity from police and other people on the lookout (since he was still human afterall). If you notice, in part 3, he hides out in the barn for a good deal of the film. As for the flashback Chris has, thats a total fluke on the production team, as just a day ago (or a few days, whatever you want to think), Jason was down the road, killing part 2 peeps. He should have had the overalls and flannel at least in that flashback, but maybe they thought it would confuse the dumbasses out there. Also, in part 4, Rob is hunting down Jason, because he killed his sister in part 2, which was just a few days ago in that movie. So.. idk. There is bad continuity, but I guess that leaves room for crazy explanations like these :lol:

I guess I am just hoping for a "fanboy" prequel that doesn\'t destroy the already laid tracks....... and won\'t suck. :confused:

[post=\"138361\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]

Good luck on that one. :whoops: