10-08-2007, 02:34 PM
<!--quoteo(post=240725:date=Oct 8 2007, 05:41 AM:name=Dr Channard)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Dr Channard @ Oct 8 2007, 05:41 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=240725\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecIt's like comparing apples to oranges - the butterfingers is a great looking bust while the silicone freddie is a sick wearable mask. I think the butterfingers really captures the essence of freddie - i would love to see what Peter Murphy could do with it if he got his hands on a blank.I'm a little biased i guess but how can a static non movable latex mask compare to this? <a href=\"http://youtube.com/watch?v=oVvL8uFvnW8\" target=\"_blank\">CLICK HERE</a>If it was a charater like a zombie maybe you could get away with a letex mask, but freddie is so animated and talks and says things like "what are you looking at bitch!" with a mouthful of rotten teeth - with a latex mask you get a silent freddie which takes away from the character big time IMO.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndAlhtough i think the silicone mask is brilliant, i dont think it captures the look of freddy at all. The butterfingers is a perfect fit for me and the accuracy to freddy is unbelievable. If only bear would of made a silicone copy like he said he would.