06-04-2009, 12:31 PM
<!--quoteo(post=315882:date=Jun 3 2009, 06:43 PM:name=knifegloves.com)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (knifegloves.com @ Jun 3 2009, 06:43 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=315882\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecI think the glove looked larger than it really was since you mostly only saw it up close. But check this photo out... the blades don't even extend the width of his face so they are obviously very short:<img src=\"http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn47/knifegloves/nightmare1behind-044.jpg\" border=\"0\" class=\"linked-image\" /><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndI'm know there isn't anyone around more studied on that glove than you, Mark....but, remember that the blades were continually sharpened and dulled which would change the shape and size of the blades. I don't know how much they were sharpened and dulled and I can't for the life of me remember where I read this but, I remember reading somewhere the sharpening/dulling in fact did change the size and shape of the blades. To what extent I don't know. I'm not sure if your going for how the glove looked when it was bulit...or how it eventually ended up looking after filming<i>(broken index blade, bent blades etc.)</i>.Btw, I love the coloring <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumbsup.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\":thumbsup:\" border=\"0\" alt=\"thumbsup.gif\" />