Why Was My Post Removed?

[🪦 TheHauntedMuseum ●]

As expected, Mario has "deflected", just as I said he would, and does NOT stay on topic. He keeps shifting. It took him over 15 minutes to write this??? My responses are below, all in caps inside his own email:<!--quoteo(post=358535:date=Apr 19 2010, 02:35 PM:name=Mario)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (Mario @ Apr 19 2010, 02:35 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=358535\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecAgh.. are not we tired of this all? Ok let me clarify some things for you, just to annul some of that nut case`s points<b>THIS IS A TYPICAL MARIO TACTIC, TO TRY AND "RALLY THE TROOPS". "ARE WE NOT ALL TIRED FRIENDS?" ITS YOUR GOOD FRIENDS MARIO HERE, I WONT HURT YOU, LETS JUST FORGET THAT THIS HAPPENED AND MOVE ON". </b>First of all, the term "hero" does not have anything to do with "screen used". "hero metal machete" means, it is not a stunt version made from rubber but made from metal with the intention to be used in cluse up scenes. "screen used" means it was used on screen.<b>MARIO MAY BE RIGHT ABOUT THIS, BUT MARIO SPECIFIES AN EXACT SCENE THAT HE SAYS THE MACHETE WAS USED IN. AND THAT, IN AND OF ITSELF, SPECIFIES SCREEN-USE!!!</b>So your Richie here is still freaking out for something HE actually did. He, the seller, offered me the item as "screen used machete" and even told me the scene it was used in. - at the end to kill Jason. I checked the film and could not find that exact machete used. So, it can not be proven that this is a screen used machte,.. just that it is a hero metal machete<b>THIS IS NOT TRUE, BUT REGARDLESS OF WHAT I SAID TO HIM, MARIO IS THE ONE WHO TOLD ME THAT THE MACHETE WAS NOT USED ON SCREEN, AND HE WAS VERY CLEAR ABOUT THIS. MARIO MADE THE FINAL DETERMINATION. SO I"LL SAY IT SINCE MARIO IS NO MAN ENOUGH......IF MARIO FEELS THAT I AM THE ONE WHO REPRESENTED IT INCORRECTLY, THEN I AM WRONG. HOWEVER, MARIO STATED IN THE EMAIL EXCHANGE THAT THE MACHETE CANNOT BE FOUND, AND I AGREED WITH HIM 100% THAT IT MUST JUST BE A PRODUCTION MACHETE............SO WHY IS THE MACHETE STILL ON HIS SITE AS THE HERO MACHETE, AND USED LATER IN THE FILM TO HIT JASON LOL??? OH, AND DID YOU SEE WHAT I WROTE BEFORE ABOUT MARIO BEING SLICK WITH WORDS??? HERO JUST MEANS NOT STUNT LOL. WELL, HE MAY HAVE A POINT, BUT IT IS MISLEADING TO SAY SUCH THINGS, WITHOUT MAKING MORE CONCRETE STATEMENTS ABOUT ITS USE. SINCE HE MAKES A CLAIM ABOUT A SPECIFIC SCENE, THAT DENOTES SCREEN-USE, AND NOW ONCE AGAIN, MARIO'S ARGUMENT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY PUT TO REST. </b>Now I ask you, is not it a shame that Rich is daffing around on numerous forums with something HE used to try to ripp me off in that deal??? I think THIS is worth a "bad seller thread".HE BLAMES ME?? HOW CUTE. I WAS UP FRONT WITH HIM, TOLD HIM ONLY WHAT I WAS TOLD, BUT THAT I HAD NO SEEN THE FILM. HOW CAN I BE ANY CLEARER LOL? I TOLD YOU HOW CUTE MARIO TRIES TO BE. HE IS ATTEMPTING TO NOW TURN THE FOCUS ON ME, AS IF TO SAY I WAS THE ONE WHO TRIED TO RIP HIM OFF. NICE TRY MARIO. EVEN IF THAT WERE TRUE, AND IF WE SUSPEND REALITY FOR A SECOND AND GIVE THAT A BIT OF CREDENCE, YOU FIGURED OUT EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DURING THE NEGOTATION STAGE WITH ME, YET YOUR DESCRIPTION IS STILL A LIE, BECAUSE YOU LIST A SPECIFIC SCENE THE ITEM WAS USED IN!! IF I AM THE PROBLEM, WHY HAVE YOU NOT TAKEN THE HIGHER GROUND, AND CORRECTED MY INCORRECT DESCRIPTION?? IF I REALLY AM THE PROBLEM, WHY ARE YOU USING MY INCORRECT DESCRIPTION??? HMMMMAs for the private collector that Rich says he went to him because he did not wanted to deal with me. I was interested in two of his items only (I think it was around 6 items all together). Rich offered to pick all items up as a bunch to broker them so he decided to go with Rich as the "middleman". However he never bought all at one place. When I asked Rich about the other items he said they are all sold. I contacted the collector and he said he does still have the other items in his possession but "someone would probably buy the whole set". Oh, and the private collector never said he does not want to deal with me, like Rich sais in his post. Actually the collector gave me a final chance on an item before he sent it to Rich:"Hey Mario, how are you doing? i'm writing this email to ask you if your interested in buying my Friday the 13th part 7 the new blood mask. It was screen used. i'm selling it tomorrow but I wanted to offer it to you first.I have a trade going on for it and the trade value is going to be around $8,500 would you be interested in it? thanks ...."I declined and so he gave it to Rich. I DO NOT DOUBT THAT MARIO MAY HAVE RECEIVED THIS EMAIL FROM THE COLLECTOR. HOWEVER, I DOUBT THE TIME FRAME THAT MARIO CLAIMS. LETS GET SCREENSHOTS OF THAT EMAIL PLEASE WITH FULL HEADERS. I ALSO FORWARDED AN EMAIL FROM MY CONTACT, TO BOTH MY CONTACT AND MARIO, SAYING THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH MARIO. HOW MUCH CLEARER DO I NEED TO BE??? NOTE: I have no idea in how many forums Richie spammed already, and I do really have not the time to check them and to answer in there again and again and again. So if there is still anything you want to know, get in contact with me directly. I`m not Rich`s Nanny who is searching for the places he did Sheep. RICHIE?? NOTE THE DISRESPECT. ALSO, MARIO REFUSES TO STAY PUBLIC, BECAUSE HE THINKS HE CAN PERSUADE YOU BETTER IN PRIVATE. I ENCOURAGE YOU NOT TO DO IT. NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY IT TOOK MARIO SO LONG TO WRITE THAT EMAIL. IT TAKES TIME TO FIGURE OUT A TACTIC TO SHIFT BLAME, AS I PREDICTED HE WOULD. I AM NOT FOOLED IN THE LEAST. ALL OF THESE POINTS MARIO TRIES TO MAKE ARE ALL MOOT POINTS, BECAUSE MARIO STILL CLAIMS THE ITEM WAS USED IN A SPECIFIC SCENE!! WEATHER OR NOT THE ERROR WAS CAUSED BY ME OR HIM, THE POINT IS, HE FOUND IT OUT, AND THEN REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT. SO YOU TELL ME WHO IS BEING DECEIPTFUL HERE LOL???RichMario<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEnd