05-10-2010, 01:21 PM
<!--quoteo(post=361332:date=May 10 2010, 02:04 PM:name=knifegloves.com)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (knifegloves.com @ May 10 2010, 02:04 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=361332\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecI don't think that the marks on her back were actually scars. I think they were just scratches. According to the early script, the glove was a self-made gardening tool.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndDoesn't matter what was in the script. It wasn't presented that way in the finished film, so the glove is pointless in the movie. If those were intended to be scratches then they shouldn't have done the makeup like they were healed scars.