02-15-2012, 09:47 PM
I wasn\'t intending to come back and post but since I was asked a fair question I will respond.
Puckface I don\'t think he knew. The issue is he comes out and admits on the open forum that this is a recast but doesn\'t feel the need to so much as apologize for selling a recast to me after he found out such. Just for the record after shipping I paid over 600 dollars for this piece, I think an apology alone would have been nice. If I sold you or anyone else a recast unknowingly but then found out what it was I would certainly at least apologize and attempt to make it right.
Just because he got burned doesn\'t mean that burning someone else (whether on purpose or not) should go without an ATTEMPT at an apology and an offer of setting things straight.
And just for the record by no means do I plan on bans or anything like that, this is why I waited to speak to him first. I am convinced he didn\'t realize at the time of sale that it was a recast.
Puckface I don\'t think he knew. The issue is he comes out and admits on the open forum that this is a recast but doesn\'t feel the need to so much as apologize for selling a recast to me after he found out such. Just for the record after shipping I paid over 600 dollars for this piece, I think an apology alone would have been nice. If I sold you or anyone else a recast unknowingly but then found out what it was I would certainly at least apologize and attempt to make it right.
Just because he got burned doesn\'t mean that burning someone else (whether on purpose or not) should go without an ATTEMPT at an apology and an offer of setting things straight.
And just for the record by no means do I plan on bans or anything like that, this is why I waited to speak to him first. I am convinced he didn\'t realize at the time of sale that it was a recast.