+- NightOwl Forums (https://forums.nightowlpro.com)
+-- Forum: The Crypt (https://forums.nightowlpro.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Forum: Off Topic (https://forums.nightowlpro.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back (/showthread.php?tid=20080)
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - SlasherHouse - 09-26-2007
Here's the guys response to my message to him.sure no prob a friend of mine gave me a bunch of horror stuff for halloween and I thought it was cool had no idea will pull it no prob though had no idea where he got it from I thought it was his he does a lot of graphic art just didnt ask RIGHT! <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\"
\" border=\"0\" alt=\"rolleyes.gif\" />
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - mayney - 09-26-2007
Yes those images are indeed copyright. My work is my intellectual property. I created an image using existing characters, but I still get to say were it gets used and were it does not. Put it this way, Dullam and Causey bring out the David bust from lost boys. They go on to ebay and they see a recast (which I believe may even have happened) Are they angry? or do they sit back and say..."Wellll it WAS David from Lost Boys""you can bet your arse they'd get their lawyers working on it, their INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY was stolen. There is absolutely no difference here.C
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - navicon - 09-26-2007
Copyright law Section 107 - "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism [or] comment . . . is not an infringement . . . ''.
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - mayney - 09-26-2007
<!--quoteo(post=239438:date=Sep 26 2007, 08:45 AM:name=navicon)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(navicon @ Sep 26 2007, 08:45 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=239438\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecCopyright law Section 107 - "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism [or] comment . . . is not an infringement . . . ''.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndFor comment would typically mean an editorial piece. This piece was originally created as a <i>private</i> painting, not to be published. I did flog a few prints of it to <i>private</i> collectors, but did not breach any kind of copyright law. Having said that, I do know my rights, and really don't feel the need to keep on this..Thanks for the concern lads.Col
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - fright-rags - 09-26-2007
Keep in mind that Colin's piece can also be considered a parody of the "dogs playing poker" image. And parodies do have some protection under copyright law. But that doesn't matter because Colin is right, his work was private and not meant to be published, sold, etc...so what this guy did was wrong, period.
Attn Colin Aka "mayney".......art Thieves Back - Cory - 09-27-2007
BOOM HEADSHOT! Proteced by Parody yo!