a lot of you say it wouldnt have effected how you felt about the movie, and for the most part, it prolly wouldnt have...
but you know one of the reasons Michael is freaky is becuase of his blank, white face... it has been easy to recreatre for each movie, yet still is a blank, white face
with a clown, I dont think it could have been changed so many times and stayed original
the kirk does it for me, either way....when you think of Loomis sayin "blank, pale, emotionless face" etc etc you can see Michaels face, AND the mask, as if the mask is representing him...
if it was the clown that represented him, Loomis could have said sumthin like "that happy, colorful, smiling face"
that wouldnt have quite pulled it off as well imo :lol:
but you know one of the reasons Michael is freaky is becuase of his blank, white face... it has been easy to recreatre for each movie, yet still is a blank, white face
with a clown, I dont think it could have been changed so many times and stayed original
the kirk does it for me, either way....when you think of Loomis sayin "blank, pale, emotionless face" etc etc you can see Michaels face, AND the mask, as if the mask is representing him...
if it was the clown that represented him, Loomis could have said sumthin like "that happy, colorful, smiling face"
that wouldnt have quite pulled it off as well imo :lol: