Well, To The Sob's

[🪦 puckface ●]

<!--quoteo(post=265191:date=Jun 28 2008, 04:40 PM:name=Vanilla Ice......Cream)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Vanilla Ice......Cream @ Jun 28 2008, 04:40 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=265191\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecSorry to say it Ray Ray,but Crash has far exceeded Cropsy in terms of accuracy. <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumbsup.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\":thumbsup:\" border=\"0\" alt=\"thumbsup.gif\" /> Put a GOHS part 3 and 4 next to Crash's 3 and 4,and you will know what I am talking about.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndCrash's paintups are more accurate yes, but I dont believe that was the point of his post. Cropsy's work is some of the finest you'll see out there as far as actual paintwork goes. Every small detail was amazing. Pick up a hockey mask nowadays and run your hand across the surface. You can usually feel the tri's, and each scratch or scuff. On Cropsy's masks, you felt only smoothness. That doesn't mean the mask is inaccurate if it's not perfectly smooth, because the screen used masks were more than likely rough as hell. But again, Cropsy's masks weren't the most accurate you could get, but the crafstmanship was amazing. When holding them in your hands, they seemed like a piece of art. But does that make it right for Cropsy to con a lot of people like he did? Not at ALL. I too hope he can man up and ship out the things he owes, but I simply chimed in to say how fine his masks where, and that this wasn't a battle of accuracy at all.