<!--QuoteBegin-JigSaw+Jul 3 2007, 03:00 AM<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(JigSaw @ Jul 3 2007, 03:00 AM)</div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--QuoteEBeginSO, in other words, you're saying Ken lied? <img src=\"http://forums.NIGHTOWLpro.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\"
\" border=\"0\" alt=\"tongue.gif\" /> He says that since he taped it off, the paint got as thick as the tape, which is why is peels off like tape. I don't see why that's not believable?<div align=\"right\"><a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=227228\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndAny hockey paint experts want to chime in on that? If it was thick enough could it behave as a solid object like tape? To be paint bonds to paint, it can't move and tear like it did....I don't think anyone would call Ken a liar, to lie is to willfully distort things, which I don't think he is doing......
