12-28-2007, 06:45 PM
<!--quoteo(post=249562:date=Dec 28 2007, 03:35 AM:name=Mick7)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Mick7 @ Dec 28 2007, 03:35 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=249562\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecCan't see it going to far?Low budget? what's the matter pal, having CG Withdrawel?the movie looks amazing, very raw and brutal,a very new take to the franchise, <!--coloro:#FFFF00<span style=\"color:#FFFF00\"><!--/coloroI see myself first in line opening day for this one.<!--colorc</span><!--/colorc<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndI guess we couldn't figure this one out considering that you advertise the film in your signature.I think the film looks horrible. Of course, I'll be seeing it opening night as well, but only because of my love for the first two films. I think Rambo III was even horrible. The only reason I enjoyed the second movie, for that matter, is because of Jim Cameron. All of the Rambo sequels were bastardizations of the original meaning and intent of David Morrell's original novel. (And I don't even care that he too sold out when penning the novelizations for the second and third films)Stallone looks ridiculous in this new film. He's told old for the role. You're right, many people might have CG withdrawal during this film, but I think they might also be reeling from the fact that not too many Green Beret warriors have had as much <i><b>plastic surgery</b></i> as Stallone's old ass.I'm sure I'll leave the theater in tears.......and not the good type of tears.