06-13-2008, 09:35 PM
<!--quoteo(post=263464:date=Jun 13 2008, 01:53 PM:name=knewby)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(knewby @ Jun 13 2008, 01:53 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=263464\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecWhy does everyone want the same, exact mask we've already seen? I'm not saying what they came up with is mindblowing or anything but whats the point of doing something again if you do it the exact same way?......Watch the PSYCHO remake if you wanna get my point. Look at the TCM remake.......different mask...still badass.............Larry<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndNoone wants the same exact, they just want better than that piece of crap! Look how fat it is! It has no depth also, its like a flat wide fat cheeked JASON mask as crash said. Not a hockeymask. The original one having the narrow look made it good, but whats with that Hockey Mask... seriosly.And the description of his appearance, them using some expensive dress shirt and a JACKET! This movie has VS all over it... Though it said he has a machete sheath strapped to his leg, which I think is cool, gives the aspect of him just living out there to me. Thought duct tapped victim? WHY?We can hope he looks good with the sack on, and unmasked...And if Jason just has the hockeymask thats gonna piss me off... I mean by the looks of it (it doesnt look like a HOCKEY mask) so i have a feeling its just Jason has it... Id like to see it from Shelly or maybe just some hockey fan...Noone wants the same, but why is it so weathered? Part 3 was the best aspect of Jason. He was some guy in the woods, (same with part 2). And showing the voorhees HOUSE is stupid. I mean the shack in part 2 was great. But if Jason has had this hockeymask for a while, thats really stupid.