07-20-2008, 07:33 PM
<!--quoteo(post=267781:date=Jul 20 2008, 03:03 PM:name=Scottyknuckles)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Scottyknuckles @ Jul 20 2008, 03:03 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=267781\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecI dont understand why people are saying its not screen accurate when its sculpted from pictures that were taken by a man who worked on the film. Not trying to be insulting just misunderstanding it thats all.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndGreat reference and a good resource isn't what makes the sculpture great.I didn't love this sculpture when it came out. As Ken said, he just wanted a good undermask to go with his hockeymasks. This isn't dead on at all. Just compare to screencaps and behind the scene pictures and you'll see. IMO, it's not "Brooker" enough. One thing really killing it is the left side of the chin and eyes. The right eye should have been raised a bit, and moved towards the nose a bit more, as well as the left eye should have been enlarged a bit.Not to mention, I'm POSITIVE Ken doesn't remember exactly what it looked like back then... There could definetly be any member here with a better eye than what Ken remembers.The reason I value this bust is because of how realistic it looks. This isn't just some mask someone made, this is a person. Erich's finishing work is phenominal, as always, and this character is believable. It does look insane with a hockeymask on it.