10-16-2008, 02:20 AM
<!--quoteo(post=280387:date=Oct 15 2008, 10:12 PM:name=puckface)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(puckface @ Oct 15 2008, 10:12 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=280387\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecit didnt take long because you didnt give enough catagories <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\"
\" border=\"0\" alt=\"rolleyes.gif\" />I, myself, was the kid that made everyone laugh yet was still cool enough to hang out with the "in crowd"....I never let that get to my head though, I was friends with who I wanted to be friends with and wasnt gonna let other people influence the way I acted, clothes I wore, or people I hung out with.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndIf I didn't limit the responses to a set no. of groups, the list would never end. No one wants to admit that they were categorized because everyone was told by Mommy at a young age that we were all special.The <i>"I, myself, was the kid that made everyone laugh yet was still cool enough to hang out with the "in crowd"..."</i> option would have been selected by everyone. I guarantee that if you interviewed 1,000 nerds out of high school that only 25% of them would actually admit to being nerdy. The other 75% would believe/admit that they weren't "cool," but not ready to accept that they might have been perceived as nerdy. But this is what the thread was about. I assumed people would oppose my set categories. It's human nature. It's just sociology. Everyone believes that they were "in the middle." No one wants to be polarized in a social spectrum.
