02-06-2009, 03:22 AM
<!--quoteo(post=296415:date=Feb 5 2009, 11:07 PM:name=Michael-The-Shape-Myers)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Michael-The-Shape-Myers @ Feb 5 2009, 11:07 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=296415\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecAll I'm saying is that part 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,and 8 all came out back-to-back but I think part 4 and 5 took a 2 year rest then came backBut I'm saying that because 1-8 came out to quick, some of the script seemed rushed, A Nightmare On Elm st, Halloween, and Texas Chainsaw Massacre all took 3-4 year brakes between each film so their the screen writers had time to write the scriptAnd Friday they have to get the cast, get the story, get the script, get the crew, find the locations, and shot the movieAnd because of the back-to-back films, I think they should of killed him off and at least wait 5 - 7 years and bring him back or something<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndthe friday films came out back to back because they were extremely popular at the time (such as the saw series). why stop producing movies if they are doing well in theatres? thats stupid...the first 5 halloween films were all released within a year or two interval. and those were the best ones. while I love the entire series, the films from the 90s/00s are very different from the previous films. why? because they had so much space in between them.