03-05-2009, 02:45 AM
<!--quoteo(post=301676:date=Mar 4 2009, 07:14 PM:name=TheMagnificentVoid)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(TheMagnificentVoid @ Mar 4 2009, 07:14 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=301676\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecThe problem now, Castle, is you're now arguing against your own original complaint of how a "transformer" could be in this new movie, that all of a sudden Skynet could have this thing now but in the first two films it was simpler tech by 2029 showing only things like Hunter/Killers. It's your latest posts that support what I have been trying to explain (apparently in novel form) how the present actions in the second and third movie have helped lead up to this altered future in T4 where Skynet is advancing more quickly.Although I doubt you could get too much from a T-800 arm that was mashed up in a cog/gear, the story in T3 was obvious . . .that by blowing up Cyberdyne it led to the work being finished (or causing most of the work to now to be done) at another building - a Military Installation backed by Military Funding and it is here that Brewster and his team were able to do MORE with the arm and chip than Cyberdyne did. This led to already building of prototypes of the hunter/killer models. There was nothing in the first two films that indicated when that tech was achieved so that it led up to the original future 2029 and the most advanced tech being the Hunter/Killers by then. The whole idea of the future not being set plays PERFECTLY here in T3 and hopefully now T4.Stopping Cyberdyne from doing their thing in T2, wound up just making things worse. We found out in T3 that it only postponed Judgment Day. Now, here in T4, it looks like what they reveal is that we also caused the advancement of Skynet even more.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndAlright, first lets clear the air! "Transformer" is something YOU first mentioned. Also, when I said "novel", I meant I didn't want to spend the hour it would have taken to explain everything in type form. I DID NOT MEAN you were writing in novel form NOR that I was annoyed or hesitant to read it because it appeared to be a longer post. Really, I'm not arguing shit! I understand EXACTLY what you are trying to get at and point out. I've clearly and precisely thought of everything you have presented me with, ALREADY, and unfortunately, that is the coarse this new movie is taking with it's timeline, machines and future. Like I tried to point out before, I just wish these new installments followed the characters, timelines, futures and nightmares, that were shown to us originally by James Cameron and William Wisher....