04-07-2009, 04:50 PM
The comparison shots show many identical markings and it just needs to be put in the right hands to verify its authenticity.If it is proven that this is indeed the real thing there may be a strong case that it would have to be returned to the original owner.That would definitely suck for the current owner.<!--quoteo(post=308120:date=Apr 7 2009, 10:40 AM:name=horrorconcepts)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (horrorconcepts @ Apr 7 2009, 10:40 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=308120\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecThis is a very interesting find to say the least. And I agree that it looks very much like the original. So at first thought I would say that the now owner is a very lucky person but at the same time, If it is the original and the seller wasn't the actual owner to begin with, even if they worked on the film or not. Couldn't the actual original owner make them return it? Ya know like what happens if someone buys a stolen car or something? The buyer is just out the cash and the goods. And maybe even face jail time for possession? Atleast that's how it is here anyway. Just the thought of that would make me sick if I were the buyer. Might be why they didn't want the info and pics spread any further?<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEnd