09-29-2009, 02:25 AM
<!--quoteo(post=332064:date=Sep 28 2009, 07:18 PM:name=DAKAZA)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (DAKAZA @ Sep 28 2009, 07:18 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=332064\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecI doubt they would be stupid enough to make him a totally sympathetic character. However, I'm still very worried that he might only be a child molester and not a child killer. Although that quick shot of the little girl's dress with claw marks through it gave me some hope. Based on that still, it would seem logical that he was, in fact, a child killer as well. Is my logic off?<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEnd*** POSSIBLE SCRIPT SPOILERS *** My gut tells me that Freddy is a child molester in this film instead of a child killer. But his methods of molestation involved unthinkable abuse and objects on his victims. The concept of Freddy coming back for revenge is still there but it's revenge on the kids he abused when they were preschool-aged instead of coming back and killing the kids of the parents who burned him alive. I think Freddy's mad that the kids told on him and that the parents burned him alive.