11-25-2009, 09:15 PM
<!--quoteo(post=340381:date=Nov 25 2009, 01:59 PM:name=ReellyScary)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (ReellyScary @ Nov 25 2009, 01:59 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=340381\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecIf you can believe a burned child killer can comes back to life and kills in dreams....then the thought of making sure he looks like an actual burn victim is irrelevant. If you buy the concept....you should buy whatever they tell you he looks like. Authentic...or not....I don't like it.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndThat... I DO agree with. He's a mystical character and exists in a world that's not bound by reality. I do prefer the original gory look but oh well. It's new. It's different. Bring it on. I'm more interested in Jackie's acting than how he looks. Maybe Robert's look mixed with his acting worked well and maybe Jackie's different take on the character will work well with his new look. We can only wait and see... but knowing how talented Jackie really is, I'm completely stoked to see what he does with this character. The 1 early review labels him as, "no nonsense, to the point, smarmy, ugly, repulsive and just plain vile." I'm looking foward to it.