02-22-2010, 05:43 PM
<!--quoteo(post=350616:date=Feb 22 2010, 03:33 PM:name=knifegloves.com)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (knifegloves.com @ Feb 22 2010, 03:33 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=350616\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecOR.... the rivet is attached and is pulling the leather up past the drawstring. <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\"
\" border=\"0\" alt=\"biggrin.gif\" /><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndI think it was attached, I'm just presenting a theory as to why it might not be.Truth is, none of us will ever know. It could be a different cicumstance in every scene as they were constantly making changes and fixing the glove and the I don't think they were expecting this sort of scrutiny so probably didn't care too much about the continuity of every last piece of the glove.i have to laugh every time I hear the words 'screen accurate'. Maybe 'scene accurate' would be a better description as the copper would have darkened naturally over filming, especially by the second film and with all the adjustments and fixes etc, your screen accurate glove is only as accurate as the lighting and camera filters etc used in the specific screen shot you choose to model it on.You'd have to base it on a picture taken in daylight with a good resolution still camera to guarantee true accuracy, and even then it could look different depending on whether the pic was taken at the start of filming or the end.
