03-01-2010, 04:22 PM
<!--quoteo(post=351782:date=Feb 28 2010, 09:05 PM:name=XtremeDesignFX)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (XtremeDesignFX @ Feb 28 2010, 09:05 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=351782\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecI typically keep my mouth shut in these situations but I just feel the need to say something in this case. For the record the SPFX was never supposed to be any one particular version. I designed(I was the sculptor) it as more of an overall look. But to ever refer to as "looking like a rubies mask" is just ridiculous. I get it. You do not like the mask, but it is anything but "Crappy". Now back to the topic at hand, I would absolutely love to see a Part four silicone Freddy and depending on price and quality would definitely be interested in buying one.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndAMEN. I own one of the later versions of the SPFX with the nicer paintjob and mesh lining and it's a FANTASTIC mask. It has a bit of screen-accurate designing but it also has custom work. I agree... comparing it to a Rubies mask or calling it "crappy" is SEVERELY underestimating the quality of that mask. Are there other more screen-accurate masks? Of course... but that wasn't the purpose of the SPFX. It amazes me how people have wildly unconventional opinions about things.As for the part 4 silicone, bring it on! Part 4 is my favorite makeup design and being an owner of your Part 4 Resin bust, you have the talent to knock it out of the park!!!