Worst Nightmare On Elm Street Sequel Of All-time

[🪦 JigSaw ●]

<!--quoteo(post=359716:date=Apr 29 2010, 10:29 AM:name=TheHauntedMuseum)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (TheHauntedMuseum @ Apr 29 2010, 10:29 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=359716\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecSee, I found Part 2 dark, which is was great, but the problem is, Part 2 broke ALL the Nightmare rules, allowing Freddy to manipulate the outside world, while people were not dreaming (like making parrots explode into flames lol). It just didn't stay true to the folklore of Freddy which is the reason I put it after parts 1,3,4, an d 7. Rich<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndIt's "Freddy's Revenge" for a reason. There's no rules to a film in it's first sequel, and it's a bit bias to judge a film based on it's sequels made afterwards. If anything, you should be mad at the films following it. Personally, I think N3 and on ward, while still fun flicks, really missed the mark. When comparing the two films (N1 and N3), it's quite ridiculous how far they astrayed fromPersonally, I felt it was a perfect sequel. It gave a new feeling to Freddy, and being that it was it's first sequel, it had that privilege. Unlike a remake, a sequel doesn't have to attribute to a specific style. It can create a new mood, though it doesn't have to as seen in the first four F13 films.