Worst Nightmare On Elm Street Sequel Of All-time

[🪦 TheHauntedMuseum ●]

<!--quoteo(post=359725:date=Apr 29 2010, 11:13 AM:name=Jigsaw)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (Jigsaw @ Apr 29 2010, 11:13 AM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=359725\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotecIt's "Freddy's Revenge" for a reason. There's no rules to a film in it's first sequel, and it's a bit bias to judge a film based on it's sequels made afterwards. If anything, you should be mad at the films following it. Personally, I think N3 and on ward, while still fun flicks, really missed the mark. When comparing the two films (N1 and N3), it's quite ridiculous how far they astrayed fromPersonally, I felt it was a perfect sequel. It gave a new feeling to Freddy, and being that it was it's first sequel, it had that privilege. Unlike a remake, a sequel doesn't have to attribute to a specific style. It can create a new mood, though it doesn't have to as seen in the first four F13 films.<!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndI see your point, but I still believe the basic premise that Freddy gets you in your dreams.Rich