07-05-2011, 08:45 PM
Bottom line is that the prosecution didn't have enough evidence. Don't know what else to say. It showed that she lied and that she covered up her daughters' death, but it wasn't strong enough to indict her as the murderer.
Have we been misled by our justice system that our courts often render verdicts we don't agree with? I mean, have we indicted Anthony prior to the trial anyways?
If so, then what need do we have for due process? It seems that due process was carried out and Anthony was cleared.
Should we forgo the burden of proof on the prosecution?
Have we been misled by our justice system that our courts often render verdicts we don't agree with? I mean, have we indicted Anthony prior to the trial anyways?
If so, then what need do we have for due process? It seems that due process was carried out and Anthony was cleared.
Should we forgo the burden of proof on the prosecution?