07-07-2011, 04:57 PM
I have to agree, reluctantly about the fact that the justice system was in line with the verdict. They didn't have enough evidence to prove that Casey killed her daughter, and the jury must have felt that it was better to let her go then live with the possibility that they sent an innocent woman to jail. I also think, however, she should have been punished for not reporting the girls disappearance for an entire month. By the time authorities were notified, all the evidence that possibly could have explained exactly what happened was gone, which comes back to the central issue of lack of evidence. If she did do it, it seems a little out of line to allow her to go free simply because she hid what happened so well? Is that really justice?