Friday The 13th (original) Vs. Friday The 13th (remake)

[mpetrie ●]

<!--quoteo(post=339002:date=Nov 13 2009, 03:42 PM:name=Threat)<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE (Threat @ Nov 13 2009, 03:42 PM) <a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=339002\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--quotec<b>what the? not so much the fact you chose the remake over the original, but to say it "sucked"? Really? That's one of horrors all time greatest movies.</b><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndMy two cents... if the original F13th is one of horror's all-time greatest movies... no wonder critics generally hate slasher flicks. I found it to be so corny I could eat it off the cob. But to each their own.

[liquidaluminum ●]

Honestly, I don't even know how the two could be compared. The remake was a combination of the first 3 movies as well all know, but the only thing that it had to do with part 1 were the opening credits. IMO, there is no comparison between an original and a remake. The orignials are what we grew up on and most of us are always going to be partial to that, just like our kids will more than likely be partial to the remakes...except mine (I drill the classics into their heads) lol.-Joseph

[01tarheel ●]

The remake sucked plain and simple.

[scream4me ●]

remake all the way and some more..

[scabboy ●]

in re: to comparing, yes they can be compared as to which is preferred or which is thought to be better. Yeah, they were polar-opposites when it comes to content though.

[dougie ●]

The original by FAR...I watched the remake again when it came out on Blu-ray and I could not stand it. The 80s slashers were some of the best slasher movies ever made.

[Darth Veach ●]

Well, it's tough...without the original we wouldn't have the remake. The original wins for pioneering the series, but I have to say if it between the two, I would watch the 2009 over and over again. Mommy is scary, but Jason is the best!