I just watched these two movies last night for the first time, and I was wondering what some of you other horror fanatics\' extensive opinions were on these two films. I thought L.H. was a very uncomfortable movie to watch in a lot of cases, but I\'ve read that was part of Craven\'s plan. This movie was entertaining though ... sort of 
I was kind of dissapointed because initially I was thinking this was just some freakhouse in a suburb. This movie was depressing at (many) times, as well as disturbing, even to today\'s standards. I can\'t help but think that Wes Craven is a pretty disturbed gentlemen himself. lol And Hills was pretty cool. Reminded me of the same feel the original TCM had. However, this movie was kind of weak with the main hairy guy reminding me of a scarred up version of the dude from Little House on the Prairie... (Last House on the Prairie Has Eyes?). Michael Berryman was great in it too. Both had a really gritty realism though, and I still think they\'re the type of films that should be seen at least. Only thing about them is I just don\'t enjoy rape and the like at all. Doesn\'t float my boat. What opinions did you people have?
I was kind of dissapointed because initially I was thinking this was just some freakhouse in a suburb. This movie was depressing at (many) times, as well as disturbing, even to today\'s standards. I can\'t help but think that Wes Craven is a pretty disturbed gentlemen himself. lol And Hills was pretty cool. Reminded me of the same feel the original TCM had. However, this movie was kind of weak with the main hairy guy reminding me of a scarred up version of the dude from Little House on the Prairie... (Last House on the Prairie Has Eyes?). Michael Berryman was great in it too. Both had a really gritty realism though, and I still think they\'re the type of films that should be seen at least. Only thing about them is I just don\'t enjoy rape and the like at all. Doesn\'t float my boat. What opinions did you people have?