03-30-2006, 03:00 AM
Quote:It\'s the RPF. It\'s full of self rightous jack asses. You either have to ignore the "I can do this but you can\'t" crap that goes on there or leave. I left..
[post=\"151665\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
Yeah I\'ve noticed that too. Every few months I\'ll drop back in for a few days to see if things have changed. Been doing that for years now.
So I guess as long as it\'s not an artists sculpture, then it\'s ok to recast? Then that means Kirks and hockey masks are fair game and we should never hear another word about "so and so recast a Hockey Mask" ??
I just think there\'s this huge gray area. That\'s the way I always thought though. I would never ever in a million years make a recast of say, The Doll Collector by Mark Goodson. But I think Kirks and hockey masks should be fair game. I know that HE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED got a good screen Hockey Mask and started offereing copies to everyone before he disappeared. But I\'ve seen a lot of pissed off people talking about how \'other\' Hockey Mask guys recasted a H.W.M.N.B.N. Hockey Mask. Now the way I see it. He didn\'t \'make\' the mask, he recast it. So if someone recasted his recast I think noone has any right to complain.
Idk. I appreciate all the comments though guys, keep em coming. This has been something myself and a few other people have been talking about for years. How come when \'so and so\' recasts a mask, it\'s fine, but when \'others\' recast the same mask, then it\'s not ok.