05-05-2007, 05:11 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Cryptoys.com+May 4 2007, 11:36 PM<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Cryptoys.com @ May 4 2007, 11:36 PM)</div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--QuoteEBeginOk, I saw the movie and thought it was the best of the 3. I really, really liked it.Here are some things:A. You do indeed see Eddie Brock Jr's skeleton in the blast.B. It's assinine to think that the greatest money maker villian would not be used again. Period. He is worth too much money to kill off.C. Eddie Brock Jr. is a venom yes, but not THE Venom. There is a reference to Eddie Brock in the first movie and McFarlane's Venom was not Jr. Jr. was used in Ultimate Spider-Man. All they have to do is have the dad (much larger, much more built man) find some of the simbiote and since he has a built in resentment at Spidey (for killing his son) boom, the real Venom! Now you have a movie.D. They never say Venom in the movie, it IS possible we haven't really been shown Venom yet.E. I never even saw a trailer yet that shown Venom, the ads were focused on Sandy and Peter. F. This movie is a character driven, well done film, where the real villain in this movie is Peter himself. G. Nuff said.<div align=\"right\"><a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=218354\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndim glad someone liked it more than i did,i didnt like the sappy sandman,thats a great idea for venoms dad to seek vengeance...kinda like harry seeking vengeance for his father but opposite...good idea....i wanna see venom again for sure....doc conners still has some symbiote