10-25-2009, 07:29 AM
Lemme tell ya, I had money on Machida...and I'll admit he lost.Machida's sole argument was the fact that he won not by a split decision, but that all three judges agreed he won.Ironic, perhaps. But when it comes down to it (just like watching instant replay in an NFL game) there has to be irrefutable evidence to overrule the call on the field. In the ring, I think judges need overwhelming evidence to de-throne a champion.One way or the other, this type of controversy discredits the UFC. I'm sure Dana White is nervous.