01-14-2011, 11:00 PM
I'm a big advocate of villains in these superhero films thus the number 1 issue I had with 3 was a phenomenon I like to call "villain-packing." Were 3 villains REALLY necessary in that film? "New" Goblin was downright ridiculous and, as Scott has already pointed out, they absolutely ruined Venom for the masses. They could had stretched this franchise on for many movies and I would have still been entertained had they stuck with the 1 per film approach. The only way "villain-packing" would work in this franchise is establishing the Sinister Six in their own films and making one including them all. Would have loved to see Mysterio, Scorpion, Shocker, Vulture, Vemon (done right), and Carnage - not to mention others.
In my opinion, the only superhero movie to have more than one villain successfully was The Dark Knight.
In my opinion, the only superhero movie to have more than one villain successfully was The Dark Knight.