06-07-2008, 05:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2008, 09:52 PM by goaliehack.)
<i>Latin accuratus, from past participle of accurare to take care of, from ad- + cura careFreedom from mistakes or error. </i>In the replica world, "screen accuracy" of a piece would be determined by how it matches in size, shape, detail, and scale to the "screen used" item it is based upon. A good way to determine if your particular prop is indeed "screen accurate" is to view the film/character a particular piece is based upon, or simply view "stills" or "screen caps" of the films character. It also never hurts to compare certain individuals interpretations to one and other. Compare detail, craftsmanship, and overall pride in the persons work. If it looks like the person only spent 5 minutes and possibly makes 15 a day, it may quite possibly be the case. To review, here is what some may consider a screen accurate piece. <img src=\"http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v469/goaliehack/da9f_1.jpg\" border=\"0\" class=\"linked-image\" />In comparison to the same film, some may not believe this to be as screen accurate. <img src=\"http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v469/goaliehack/fozzie.jpg\" border=\"0\" class=\"linked-image\" />There is nothing wrong with owning a piece that is not very accurate, and is simply a good overall representation of a particular film. However, there is something wrong with owning a piece that is not very accurate, and claiming that it is in fact "THE" most accurate. In the real world that is a serious offense known as fraud, and nobody likes a criminal! So keep it real, stay safe, and stay out of jail. <img src=\"style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumbsup.gif\" style=\"vertical-align:middle\" emoid=\":thumbsup:\" border=\"0\" alt=\"thumbsup.gif\" />P.S. this was just a joke......