Spiderman 3

[🪦 puckface ●]

lol, somebody back me up, Mike sais that DURING Venom's explosion, you dont see Eddie Brock's skeletonI know someone else saw it, help me out lol

[🪦 mike ●]

well the main villian in the film was parker himself fighting his anger sandman wasnt a real bad guy harry wasnt either it was all about people fighting within themselves

[🪦 mike ●]

i said he didnt explode liek u made it sound casue they wouldnt show a body explding in a pg 13 movie

[🪦 sephit ●]

eddie brocks skeleton is clearly shown when he gets blasted with the symbiote with the use of the exploding pumpkin thrown by spiderman,someone said there wouldnt be skeletons shown in a pg13 movie,well there was and if you remember in part 1 green goblin throws pumpkins at the people at the balcony and it shows them turn to skeletons...

[Willowman]

Yeah, the skeleton is exactly why I originally asked why you thought Venom would be back. You can clearly see his bones during the explosion. If they did bring Venom back(and I can\'t see that happening--I read that Sam Raimi doesn\'t like the character) it would have to be someone other than Brock...

[🪦 sephit ●]

i dont know why he hates the character, i have read that also before,venom is my favorite villain of the spiderman series,they actually did him some justice in the movie,i didnt really like how the green goblin looked so different from the comics.....carnage would be pretty sick,lizard has to come sometime i mean doc conners has to be wanting a new arm sometime loli didnt like the sandman much,the rhino would be stupid,electro might be cool...thats all i can think of right now

[🪦 EVOL ●]

<!--QuoteBegin-Willowman+May 5 2007, 12:15 AM<div class=\'quotetop\'>QUOTE(Willowman @ May 5 2007, 12:15 AM)</div><div class=\'quotemain\'><!--QuoteEBeginYeah, the skeleton is exactly why I originally asked why you thought Venom would be back.  You can clearly see his bones during the explosion.  If they did bring Venom back(and I can't see that happening--I read that Sam Raimi doesn't like the character) it would have to be someone other than Brock...<div align=\"right\"><a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=218350\"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><!--QuoteEnd</div><!--QuoteEEndEddie died in the comic and he came back.If Venom is set for 4. It would be easy to bring Eddie back since they do it in the comic all the time. They probally did that just to make everyone think that Eddie is dead.

[Willowman]

I don\'t know, Jay...he was incinerated. There\'s really no plausible way to bring him back. There wouldn\'t even be DNA left to clone him.

[🪦 Cryptoys.com ●]

Ok, I saw the movie and thought it was the best of the 3. I really, really liked it.Here are some things:A. You do indeed see Eddie Brock Jr's skeleton in the blast.B. It's assinine to think that the greatest money maker villian would not be used again. Period. He is worth too much money to kill off.C. Eddie Brock Jr. is a venom yes, but not THE Venom. There is a reference to Eddie Brock in the first movie and McFarlane's Venom was not Jr. Jr. was used in Ultimate Spider-Man. All they have to do is have the dad (much larger, much more built man) find some of the simbiote and since he has a built in resentment at Spidey (for killing his son) boom, the real Venom! Now you have a movie.D. They never say Venom in the movie, it IS possible we haven't really been shown Venom yet.E. I never even saw a trailer yet that shown Venom, the ads were focused on Sandy and Peter. F. This movie is a character driven, well done film, where the real villain in this movie is Peter himself. G. Nuff said.

[Willowman]

I guess I\'m assinine then. Cause I can\'t see Raimi using him again, the producers had to pressure him into it in the first place. Of course, Raimi may not do another one.